Welcome to the new Gigaspaces XAP forum. To recover your account, please follow these instructions.
Hello,
is event-based remoting and/or execution of remote tasks "fair" in FIFO sense? If it is not, is there a possibility of a livelock (a task is not executed for a very long time because it is always pushed back by new tasks)? If a livelock is possible, do you recommend any special configuration to reduce a possibility of a livelock?
Yes - see : EventDrivenRemotingProxyConfigurer.fifo (true)
Shay
The documentation for a polling container states that it must run in a 1-thread mode to support FIFO (https://docs.gigaspaces.com/xap/12.0/...).
Could you please confirm if this really applies when a polling container is used for an event-based service. If this is the case indeed, than this is performance-killer.
Sequencing / ordering will always impact processing throughput. If you would like to increase processing throughput you will need more partitions to spread the activity across additional queues.
I suggest you test this with a single partition and see how it behaves. Later you can scale this. You can consider batching , but this will impact processing implementation.
Another option is FIFO grouping that will provide multichannel processing within a partition.
Asked: 2017-06-09 01:59:39 -0500
Seen: 38 times
Last updated: Jun 09
Copyright GigaSpaces, Inc. Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 license.
